Ask who owns it.Get the record back.
Owner of record, the filed portfolio, the ranked market — in one call, inside the assistant you already have open.
1,000properties or entities a month, free. No card, no trial timer. Every figure comes back with the record behind it.
Who are the largest multifamily property owners in Tampa by assessed value?
Across 4,518 multifamily parcels screened in one call, the largest filed owners by assessed value:
- 1POST APARTMENT HOMES LP$287,425,9444 parcels
- 2WST 815 WATER STREET LLC$186,234,6001 parcel
- 3CAMDEN OPERATING LP$168,905,0003 parcels
- 4WST 1010 WATER STREET LLC$164,000,0001 parcel
- 5AREIT MANOR RIVERWALK LLC$157,314,3001 parcel
County tax roll · 4,518 parcel records · 3,331 distinct filed names
Rows are parcels filed under the same name, not resolved owners. Confirm with a registered identifier before relying on common ownership.
The same question,with and without.
| Web search only | Same model, connected | |
|---|---|---|
| Retrieval | 12 searches · 11 fetches | 1 call |
| Time to answer | — | 0.46s |
| Multifamily owners ranked | 0 | 5 |
| Parcels screened | — | 4,518 |
An em-dash means not measured. The web-search run has no recorded wall clock, and a dash is both honest and more damning than a guess.
Same model, same question. The difference is whether it has the records.
Who are the largest multifamily property owners in Tampa by assessed value?
- “there is no published ranking of Tampa multifamily owners by assessed value”
- “would have to be compiled by hand from parcel records”
- “an informed approximation, not a definitive ranking”
Read the full answer, verbatim524 words
Short answer up front: there is no published ranking of Tampa multifamily owners by assessed value. I searched for one — local business-journal lists, county financial reports, and academic/watchdog studies — and the rankings that actually exist are by unit count, usually at the metro or national level, not by what the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser has on the tax roll. Assessed value per owner would have to be compiled by hand from parcel records, and it's genuinely hard to do because most large apartment complexes are held in single-purpose LLCs (one LLC per property), so the owner names on the tax roll don't match the parent companies.
Here's what I could verify from public reporting, which gives a reasonable picture of who the biggest multifamily owners in the Tampa market are:
Likely at or near the top:
- Camden Property Trust (NYSE: CPT) — the Houston-based REIT has long been one of the largest apartment owners in the Tampa market. Its Florida portfolio is roughly 25 communities and 9,000+ apartment homes, and Camden has said Tampa is the leader among its Florida markets. It's still actively buying (e.g., a 360-unit Clearwater community for ~$138.7M in 2025). As a REIT that holds Class A properties long-term, it very likely ranks at or near the top by assessed value. - American Landmark Apartments — headquartered in Tampa, ~32,000 units across the Sun Belt (No. 34 on the 2025 NMHC Top 50 owners list), and it has claimed the title of largest multifamily owner in Florida by portfolio size. A meaningful share of its portfolio is in Tampa Bay. - Blackstone and Greystar — named in 2025 reporting (Private Equity Stakeholder Project data covered by the Tampa Bay Times and others) as the largest private-equity apartment owners with significant Tampa Bay holdings. PESP found private equity firms own about 56,700 units, roughly 23–25% of all Tampa Bay apartments — the highest cost-burden growth of any large metro.
Other frequently cited large owners/operators in the market (from local news coverage, without reliable per-owner totals): Independence Realty Trust (IRT), Cortland, ZMR Capital (Tampa-based), TLR Group (Tampa-based), Robbins Property Associates, Bell Partners, and Related Group on the development side.
One assessed-value data point I did find: on Hillsborough County's official 2024 "Top Ten Taxpayers" list, the biggest taxpayers are Tampa Electric (~$3.84B taxable value), the Aviation Authority, and WST Water Street LLC (the Vinik/Cascade Water Street Tampa development, which includes apartments but is mixed-use). No pure-play apartment owner appears at the very top of the county-wide list, which tells you multifamily ownership here is fragmented across many entities rather than concentrated in one dominant taxpayer.
If you need the actual by-assessed-value ranking, the only way to get it is to build it: download the Hillsborough County tax roll (free from the Property Appraiser at hcpafl.org, or the Florida DOR's NAL file), filter to multifamily use codes, and group parcels by owner mailing address (mailing address is more reliable than owner name because of the LLC-per-property problem). I'd treat any list that hasn't done that aggregation — including my list above — as an informed approximation, not a definitive ranking.
No multifamily owner ranking produced. Reproduced verbatim from the capture dated 2026-07-26; the answer’s trailing source-link list is kept in the capture record.
Who are the largest multifamily property owners in Tampa by assessed value?
Across 4,518 multifamily parcels screened in one call, the largest filed owners by assessed value:
- 1POST APARTMENT HOMES LP$287,425,9444 parcels
- 2WST 815 WATER STREET LLC$186,234,6001 parcel
- 3CAMDEN OPERATING LP$168,905,0003 parcels
- 4WST 1010 WATER STREET LLC$164,000,0001 parcel
- 5AREIT MANOR RIVERWALK LLC$157,314,3001 parcel
County tax roll · 4,518 parcel records · 3,331 distinct filed names
Rows are parcels filed under the same name, not resolved owners. Confirm with a registered identifier before relying on common ownership.
Exhibit B was captured 2026-07-26 on claude-fable-5, reproduced verbatim. Exhibit C is the live connector’s return values for the identical call, timing measured through production. Both captures are kept in the repository, dated.
Add to Claude for freeMillions of official records, joined into one graph and wired to their sources.
A name on a filing is not an identity. Every mention is kept as it was filed, relationships are only drawn where there is evidence for them, and name variants that have not been resolved stay visibly unresolved. A matching spelling is never treated as proof.
Assembled from official records and kept current, so an answer arrives with the record behind it rather than a number you have to go and confirm somewhere else.
Brief it like an analyst. Get the record back attached.
“Rank every multifamily owner in Tampa by assessed value.”
One call across the whole roll: filed owner, parcel count, assessed total. That is your call list, sorted by who actually holds the paper.
“Who owns 3600 NW 19th Terrace, and what else do they hold?”
Owner of record, then every other parcel filed under that name, with the county and roll year on each. The rest of the portfolio is the reason for the call.
“Is there CMBS debt behind this borrower?”
Searches the monitored ABS-EE disclosures for a borrower or collateral match, then shows the filing, the evidence, and any identity caveat before you price it.
“Everything on this LLC. Cite it.”
Registered identifiers, related filings, the parcels, and the public record behind each line. The ownership section of the memo, sourced.
A filed name is called a filed name
Single-purpose LLCs are how this asset class holds title, so two entities sharing a name are never silently merged into one sponsor. That is the distinction that ruins a portfolio roll-up.
One click. Then just ask.
- 1Click the button below. Claude opens with the connector already filled in.
- 2Approve it, and sign in with Google.
- 3Ask your first question. That's it; there is nothing to install.
Works the same in Claude’s desktop app and in Cowork. In Claude Code, run:
claude mcp add --transport http cre-intelligence https://creintelligence.io/mcp
Signed out of claude.ai? It asks you to sign in first. Click the button again after that and the connector details are still filled in.
Before you ask.
Is it actually free?
Yes. Connect it, sign in with Google, and start asking. There is no card and no trial timer. The free tier covers 200 distinct properties or entities a day, up to 1,000 a month, which is about a week of real research. You only pay if you outgrow it.
I'm not technical. Can I do this?
If you can click a link, yes. The button below opens Claude with everything filled in. You approve it once. From then on you just ask Claude questions in plain English and it knows how to look things up. There is nothing to install and no new app to check.
What does it actually cover?
Ownership of record, the entities behind it, and the debt and filings attached to it — assembled from official records and kept current. Ask the connector what it covers for a market you care about and it answers precisely, market by market. That is a better answer than a number on a marketing page, and it is the one that stays true.
How is this different from CoStar or a list broker?
Three ways. It answers inside the tool you already work in, so there is no second login and no exporting. Every answer arrives with the public record it came from, so you can check it. And it is priced like software, not like a seat licence.
Will it make things up?
Claude or ChatGPT can still make a mistake. The connector reduces that risk by returning source IDs, calculation scope, and explicit coverage warnings, and by labeling filed-name groups as candidates rather than resolved identity. Material decisions should still be checked against the returned record.
Can I use it in my own agent?
That is the point. It is a standard MCP server with OAuth and a documented tool surface. Claude Code, the OpenAI Responses API, LangGraph, or anything else that speaks MCP connects the same way.
Priced per record, not per seat.
- 200 a day
- 25 records per response
- No card, no trial timer
- 1,000 a day
- 100 records per response
- $9.80 per 1,000 subjects
- 4,000 a day
- 200 records per response
- $7.96 per 1,000 subjects
- 20,000 a day
- 500 records per response
- $4.99 per 1,000 subjects
Metered on distinct properties and entities disclosed, not on questions asked. Returning to the same subject all day costs you nothing extra, which is what research actually looks like.
Questions about a plan? paul@pacificsoftwareventures.com